首页> 外文OA文献 >Validity of the McMurray's Test and Modified Versions of the Test: A Systematic Literature Review
【2h】

Validity of the McMurray's Test and Modified Versions of the Test: A Systematic Literature Review

机译:McMurray检验和检验修订版的有效性:系统文献综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Clinical assessment of meniscal pathology in the knee has proven difficult due to the wide number of tests available and variations in their interpretation and application. The purpose of this paper was to assess the literature investigating the validity and diagnostic accuracy of the McMurray's test (and modifications) for determining meniscal pathology of the knee so that conclusions could be drawn regarding its clinical usefulness as a test. Electronic databases (Medline, CINhAL, AMED, SPORTSDiscus, and SCOPUS) were searched from March 1980 to May 2008. In addition, cited references of relevant articles were examined. Studies were included for analysis if they compared the McMurray's test with a gold standard of knee arthroscopy or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Collectively, these studies indicate that there is little consensus in the reported measures of validity of the McMurray's test and that this is mostly due to limitations in the methodological quality of the studies that were assessed. Methodological scores on the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) yielded scores from 10/25 to 20/25. Generally, the McMurray's test has relatively high specificity and low sensitivity. The studies that compared the diagnostic accuracy of the McMurray's test with that of modified versions of the test showed enhanced diagnostic accuracy for the modified tests. This review identified that the McMurray's test is of limited clinical value due to relatively low sensitivity, with modified tests (associated with the traditional McMurray's test) having higher diagnostic accuracy and thus these may be more useful clinically.
机译:由于可用的测试种类繁多,而且解释和应用各不相同,因此膝盖半月板病理的临床评估已被证明是困难的。本文的目的是评估有关研究McMurray测试(和修改)用于确定膝关节半月板病理的有效性和诊断准确性的文献,以便就其作为测试的临床实用性得出结论。从1980年3月至2008年5月,检索了电子数据库(Medline,CINhAL,AMED,SportsDiscus和SCOPUS)。此外,还对相关文章的引用进行了审查。如果他们将McMurray检验与膝关节镜或磁共振成像(MRI)的金标准进行了比较,则将其纳入分析。十一项研究符合纳入标准。总体而言,这些研究表明,在所报告的McMurray检验有效性的度量标准中几乎没有共识,这主要是由于所评估研究方法学质量的局限性所致。 STARD(诊断准确性报告标准)上的方法学得分为10/25至20/25。通常,麦克默里氏试验具有较高的特异性和较低的灵敏度。将McMurray的测试的诊断准确性与测试的修改版本的诊断准确性进行比较的研究表明,修改后的测试的诊断准确性更高。这篇综述指出,由于灵敏度相对较低,McMurray检验的临床价值有限,而改良的检验(与传统McMurray检验相关)具有更高的诊断准确性,因此在临床上可能更有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号